Diabytes
NCDRC News
)
The NCDRC was considering the review petition filed by the railways against the lower fora order allowing the complaint and asking it to pay a compensation of Rs 36,000 to Rajasthan resident Nand Kishore.
)
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) noted that possession was not given even after five years and asked New Delhi-based Adel Landmarks Limited to refund over Rs 66 lakh to five customers who were allotted flats in their project in Gurgaon in 2012.
)
The loan agreement was covered by 'Free Personal Accident Insurance Policy' which in case of the death the borrower, could adjust the insurance amount to the bank, it said.
)
The apex consumer commission has asked a real estate firm to refund over Rs 49 lakh to a home buyer for delay in handing over possession of a property saying a buyer cannot be expected to wait indefinitely.
A Sahara Group company has been directed by the apex consumer body to refund over Rs 1.43 crore to a home buyer for its failure to give possession of a bungalow in one of its housing projects near Nagpur.
)
The Supreme Court on Monday directed real estate firm Unitech to furnish a list of cases pending against it in various consumer fora and the amount involved in these matters.
)
Supreme Court said that flat owners can directly approach the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) as a group against real estate players.
)
The apex consumer commission has directed real-estate major Unitech Hi-Tech Developers Ltd to pay over Rs three crore to a couple for failing to give them possession of an apartment booked under one of its housing projects at Noida in 2010.
)
India is not a banana republic and builders will have to pay penalty to all home buyers for delay in delivery- National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's judgment on Friday drew the point home.
)
The HDFC Bank "has got no love and respect for India" as it put the country's reputation at stake by not activating a debit card of a couple "trapped in a foreign country", the apex consumer court has said.
)
The Bombay High Court had on August 13 lifted the ban on nine variants of the fast food and asked the company to go for fresh tests.
)
)
The Supreme Court Tuesday sought the Centre's response to a plea of Nestle India Ltd against an order for testing of 16 more samples of Maggi noodles in connection with the government's Rs 640 crore suit against the company for alleged unfair trade practices.
)
Nestle relaunched Maggi noodles on November 9.
)
Seems that crisis is not yet over for instant noodle maker Nestle.
)
The apex consumer court on Tuesday said "unending testing of Maggi samples cannot go on", following the Rs 640-crore class action suit filed by the government against Nestle India.
)
The apex consumer court Tuesday reserved its order on whether 31 more samples of Maggi noodles should be sent for testing in connection with the government's Rs 640 crore suit against Nestle India for alleged unfair trade practices.
)
The apex consumer court Thursday ordered testing of 13 samples of Maggi noodles to ascertain the claims made in Centre's Rs 640 crore suit against Nestle India alleging unfair trade practices in relation to lead and MSG content in the product.
)
Alleging bias, Nestle India Limited Wednesday told the apex consumer commission that it was being "singled out" by the government in the Maggi noodles ban case as no action was being taken against other manufacturers of similar products.
)
Loading...
 "Will Hindus get justice in Bengal's Murshidabad?")
 "DNA: Uproar over freebies in Delhi!")
 "DNA: AIMIM plans to field 2020 Delhi riots accused Shahrukh Pathan")
 "DNA: A report showing the reality of Bangladesh")
 "DNA: Power Theft Allegations Against SP MP Ziaur Rahman Barq")
 "DNA: Hot Tea Linked to Cancer Risk!")
 "DNA: Why Jordan Fears After Syria’s Coup?")
 "DNA: NSA Ajit Doval’s China Visit - Inside Story")
 "DNA: Gandhi Family Ruined My Career, says Mani Shankar Aiyar")
 "DNA: Ground Report- Tight Security Arrangements for Mahakumbh")
